Monday, December 21, 2009

The Star, Dec 22, 2009...

I read this earlier today... I do not completely agree with the article, but there are certain aspects of it that I am compelled to agree with... the author caught my attention mainly due to the fact that he talks about re-interpretation of the Quranic verses... please note that I believe the Noble Quran is a book of Divine guidence, and hence the Noble Quran MUST NEVER BE RE-INTEPRETED as no re-interpretation is required... what is written is clearly written, and Allah SWT has a purpose for everything... this part I agree whole-heartedly with the Author, Syariah Law, the Law Allah SWT gave to us, should never be altered...

My question to you is If we proclaim to have iman in Allah SWT, iman that Allah SWT is omnipotent, then why do we question the law as prescribed by Allah SWT?..

-----------------------------------


EVERY rightly guided Muslim holds that he is obliged to follow the law of Allah, namely the Syariah. It is the revealed law, the path shown by Allah through His messenger, Muhammad.

To the mind of an unbeliever, perhaps, it is rather strange that the Muslims today still want to maintain and follow the law that was revealed more than one thousand years ago. The command to follow the law is evident in this Quranic verse: “We made for you a law, so follow it, and not the fancies of those who have no knowledge.”

The Quran, which was revealed to Muhammad, is something very important to every Muslim, not just personal to the Prophet. No Muslim has the authority to add anything to it, or to make alteration, or to omit anything from it. They have the duty and responsibility to preserve the Book for the guidance of all mankind
till the end of the day. They are also constantly reminded of what the Jews and the Christians had done to their holy books and warned not to do the same to the Quran — “Have you any hope that they will be true to you when a party of them used to listen to the Word of Allah, then used to change it, after they have understood it knowingly?” (2: 75).

Unless the person accepts the authority of the Quran he will never understand why the Muslims are like that. What a Muslim can do is to convince that person that the Quran is the word of God for all mankind.

In the beginning, the Meccan Arabs also refused to accept the teaching of Muhammad, preferring instead the way of life they inherited from their forefathers. Their attitude is condemned by the Quran: “And when it is said unto them: Follow that which Allah has revealed, they say: We follow that wherein we found our fathers. What! Even though their fathers were wholly unintelligent and had no guidance?” (2:170). This argument is still relevant now.

Professor Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, founder and ex-director of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), always reminds his students of the need to have a proper response and attitude towards the challenge of modernity.

Today, he said, among the Muslim intellectuals and leaders are those who are bringing the same problems as what the Christians are having. This is because there are a lot of changes happening, and the Muslims begin to ask how to overcome problems associated with those changes. That means, they say, we have to re-interpret some verses, otherwise the Muslims will refuse to accept the teaching of the Quran.

This is very dangerous and if we allow it to happen there will be no end to it. When discussing the economic problems of the Muslims, for example, some Muslim scholars blame the Islamic law of inheritance, suggesting it to be changed to keep up with the time. But how are they going to change it when the Quran is very clear on it? They, nevertheless, argued that in those days women did not work while today women work with some of them even getting higher income than their husbands, and because of that the provisions for inheritance should be made equal. his, they said, would help correct the economic imbalance among the Muslims.

We cannot simply accept the given reason without asking for proof that Islamic law of inheritance is the cause of Muslims’ economic problem. We are not going to accept it as if it is an undeniable fact, whereas it is just an unproven assumption.

Some others called upon the Muslims to look into the spirit of the verses about inheritance because now the situation has changed, and looking at the spirit of it now, they say, inheritance between male and female should be made equal.

That is not a correct argument, because regarding the verses of the Quran that are unambiguous one cannot say that one must look into the spirit of the matter. That is precisely the way Western people look at law, for their law is written by man and therefore they can always look into the spirit of the law.

Similarly, when confronted with the problem of women and gender equality, many Muslim thinkers do not realise that some of these problems are not actually relevant to the Muslims. Some of the problems about equality and demand for justice arose because of the early doctrines of Christianity on the position of women. The Muslims did not have such problems, but now they do have
it, not due to something inherent in Islam, but due to the Muslims’ isunderstanding of their own religion.

Some of our modern ulama, according to al-Attas, are to be blamed for not teaching people properly, so sometimes there is injustice. They are often seen to be on the side of men in matters of law, for example in matters of divorce and polygamy, whereas women are not given clear understanding of their rights.

This is due to wrong teaching and misunderstanding, and this can be corrected by re-educating the Muslims properly, not by declaring equality and trying to follow the West. We can’t abolish any law that is clearly stated in the Quran.

This is, sadly, the state of affair of the Muslims, who have generally become ignorant and confused. As a result, false leaders thrive among them.

All these have to be changed, and in order to do that the Muslims have to look into hemselves to find out what are they lacking, and whether they are thinking correctly. The real problem with the Muslims today is the corruption of knowledge which can be seen in the way we believe and the way we do things. At the same time our people are trying to follow the footsteps of the Western people including the way they observe religion. We must be precise in our thinking, and be able to see how the logic goes. That is what we can learn from the science of kalam, which, unfortunately, people today do not care to learn any more. As a result they cannot think properly, nor can they argue or understand arguments.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

My opinion of that issue...

What infuriates me about this is Why do they wanna use the word Allah for God?
The word for God in Malay/Indoensian is Tuhan… the word God in Arabic is Illah… so why the word Allah?

The characteristics that describe God in Islam as Allah are described in Surah al-Iklas…

1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only;

2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute, Omnipotent;

3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;

4. And there is none like unto Him.

God isn’t one is Christianity, Christians believe in the Holy Trinity, we believe in the one-ness of God… despite the fact that they’ll argue God is One to them, their believe in the Holy Trinity goes against the very concept of Allah…

God isn’t omnipotent to the Christians… in Genesis they say god “rested” on the 7th day after the process of creation… doesn’t sound very omnipotent to me… we muslims believe that Allah doesn’t rest, Allah is All-Mighty, why would an All-Mighty being such as Allah need to rest?

Jesus, as described in Christianity, is the son of God… Allah’s characteristic is that he has no parents, nor is he a parent… see the point here? Quite obvious…

Most importantly is that Allah’s features, physically, is beyond our comprehension… we do not know how Allah looks like, BUT, the Christians say that we humans are created in the image of God…

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009 - The Sun

Court to hear Melanau woman’s Allah CD case on Jan 12

Kuala Lumpur: The High Court here will hear on Jan 12 the application by a Melanau woman to challenge the Home Ministry’s decision to confiscate eight compact discs (CDs) of Christian religious teachings containing the word “Allah”.

Justice Datuk Alizatul Khair Osman fixed the date in chambers yesterday.

Jill Ireland Lawrence Bill, 27, was granted leave on May 4 to initiate judicial review proceedings against the ministry and the government, as respondents, to seek three reliefs from the court.

She wants an order of certiorari to quash the ministry’s decision to confiscate the CDs, an order of mandamus to direct the ministry to return the CDs to her and a declaration that she has the legitimate expectation to exercise her right to possess, use and import publications containing the word “Allah”.

On May 11 last year, the ministry seized the CDs under Section 9 (1) of the Printing Presses And Publications Act 1984 when Ireland, a clerk, disembarked at the Low Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT) in Sepang.

The CDs with titles such as Cara Menggunakan Kunci Kerajaan Allah and Ibadah Yang Benar Dalam Kerajaan Allah were brought in from Indonesia.

Ireland, a Sarawakian native of the Christian faith, said she used the word “Allah” in her prayers, worship and religious education.

She said she received a letter dated July 7 last year from the ministry outlining the reasons for the confiscation, including that it was a threat to security, that is used prohibited words and that it was a breach of Jakim guidelines.

She was represented by counsel Annou Xavier. - Bernama